Swiroset.com

Powering future

The hope of a theory of two nations versus the dream of a single Palestinian nation without Israel

The hope of a theory of two nations versus the dream of a single Palestinian nation without Israel

The candidacy for Palestinian statehood paints a picture of a battered Palestine seeking justice for the world. Here are the facts to keep in mind. Palestine has consistently refused to build its state in the past; they rejected the offer in 1937 by the British government, which then ruled Palestine, to divide the land into Arab and Jewish states. Arab leaders refused again in 1947, choosing to go to war rather than accept the UN’s decision to divide Palestine between the Jewish and Arab populations. In 1967, Israel offered to give up the land it had acquired in exchange for peace with its neighbors. The Arab world issued a response at a summit in Khartoum, “There is no peace with Israel, there are no negotiations with Israel, there is no recognition of Israel.” In 2000, under the proposal of the Middle East Quartet, Israel’s Prime Minister Ehud Barak offered the Palestinians a sovereign state with shared control of Jerusalem and billions of dollars in compensation for Palestinian refugees. Yasser Arafat rejected the offer and returned to launch the deadly terrorist war known as the Second Intifada.

After all the persistent denials, Abbas painfully pleads with the world to end the so-called historical injustice with a demand for full membership of the state of Palestine in the UN and declared the legitimate right of Palestine to achieve its freedom and independence.

Consider the following points: Statehood and settlements are not the problem of the Palestinian leadership. Had it been so, the Palestinian leadership would have accepted the offer of a state and built a state. If Abbas really wanted a state of Palestine to live in peace with Israel, he could have given his commitment in New York to end the conflict and extend the guarantee to take measures to stop the hatred and murder of the Jewish people. This would have secured the first step in building peace and marrying for a bilateral agreement instead of running to the UN.

The rejection of the state offer clearly indicates that Palestine is not seeking peace. The existence of Israel is the problem that is believed to be solved by internationalizing the conflict with Israel. Palestine’s goal is a single nation to be achieved by removing Israel from the map of the Middle East. The Palestinian leadership found the viable route through a UN offer and by gaining UN membership to use the platform and network to challenge Israel’s current holdings and minimize its territories; while at the same time planning an integrated action to annihilate Israel through the Arab network. Iran’s nuclear program is part of Israel’s annihilation plan. The poster/website and Facebook campaigns are implemented to gain worldwide sympathy under the lies.

The horrible comments conferred on the Jews are enough to provoke World War III. Israel is brazenly called imperialist and colonialist in its patriotic conflict. Israel and Palestine do not have a relationship of ruler and ruled or oppressor and oppressed to disparagingly describe Israel as fascist. Jews around the world represent various racial ethnicities in different shades that cannot justify the racist and apartheid abuses launched against Israel. The mind-boggling accusation as a child killer in Internet and Facebook poster campaigns without evidence spits in their face. They are ridiculed as people of mythical origin ‘Chosen by God’. The Chinese are the center of the universe, Muslims receive heavenly reward for the demolition of non-Muslims on earth, the Hindu caste system ordained eternal status to a man through all generations, and the racial superiority of men whites lynched the world. They do not mock these absurdities of humanity while deeply wounding the world in the Jewish notion of being ‘Chosen by God’ and being deeply attached to their ancient homeland.

The Jews are treated as criminals and sinners in self-defense and accused as interlopers in their settlement in their own homeland against the Arab settlers who came as vagrants from Egypt and Jordan in that empty land after the Jewish diaspora following the Roman invasion. The Arabs did not create any state in that ancient Jewish homeland within this time frame. Returning to their homeland under a special humanitarian package of global sympathy is questioned by perverts after 65 years of their statehood and some obnoxious academics even dared to question the origin of a 5000 year old culture to ridicule their history as mere myths discrediting the value. of the ancient scriptures as literary sources for the construction of history and snobbishly despising the archaeological monuments and remains of their ancestry. Life is about accommodating needs and also about empathizing with suffering and it is called an inclusive approach in today’s public affairs management. The dozens of cruel Arab nations in oil-rich lands do not believe in such a principled approach to being inclusive and humane to make life worth living and instead waste themselves on networking for a plan to expel Israel forever.

In this notorious elimination game mission, the world’s pseudo-intellectuals and perverts further helped construct vague theories to question Israel’s history, culture, and heritage in order to oppose Zionism, which their bleary eyes see as the cause. of the problem when this happens. an effect of Israel’s insecurity problem, which will disappear when the cause of the problem is removed. By attacking the symptoms, they feed more radical actions that feed more hatred towards Jews and do not help to solve the problem. Propaganda against Israel as a terrorist state in self-defense is a petty description that does not justify the practical situation in life. If one’s very existence is threatened, would anyone sit quietly? No. He agreed that Israel responded vehemently to these challenges that led humanitarian calls and sympathizers to question the civil liberties and rights of Palestinians without acknowledging the same facts in all terrorist situations. The dilemma of countering terrorism and becoming the terror of the innocent is not unique to a single case; it has become a global problem. Palestinian violation of Israel’s civil rights and freedoms is justified, but the opposite is not justified.

The popular poster posted on websites and Facebook showing a child holding the banner “Stop killing Palestinian children” in a poster campaign brazenly accused Israel of murdering children without evidence. It is not to justify killing but to see killing in the perspective of conflict situations around the world, global cases must be referred to validate the act of self-defense in the face of a threat. The Israel-Palestine situation is not like the massacre of innocent civilians by the dictatorship in the Middle East. Anti-Jewish campaigns blamed Zionists for a radical turn of events without understanding the chain between radical action leading to radical action and overlooking the PLA’s role in initiating terrorism after repeated rejection of the offer of a state Palestinian.

In this conflict of half a century. where the Jews and Palestine have been openly at war and declared enemies, does anyone think that slaughter will not occur in such a conflict situation? In all conflict situations, killing is the strategy and it will be carried out. To stop the slaughter, reconciliation is proposed. The process has not been successful in Israel-Palestine because the Palestinian leadership is not interested in a two-nation theory and does not want peace. The Palestinian leadership wants a single state for Palestine through the elimination of the Jews.

The keen eye should be able to see the State of Palestine offer in the UN and the pursuit of UN membership today as a strategy to achieve the goal of a single Arab state through a methodology of annihilation of Israel and territorial acquisition. Prejudice campaigns accused Israel of being a terrorist and a murderer while endorsing real terrorism and ruthlessly supporting its global marketing hype spree to win world sympathy for a help to achieve its birthright; yes, a freedom for an ideology to operate uninhibited to remove Israel from the map of the world and remove in due course useless supporters.

Do you have hope for peace? Then stand united in urging a bilateral framework based on mutual respect, cooperation, and coexistence for Israel and Palestine with Abbas’s special commitment to declare recognition of the state of Israel alongside the state of Palestine.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*